Charles County Detectives Arrest Two Juveniles After Armed Robbery in White Plains

January 14, 2020

Officers Identify and Arrest Two Suspects in Armed Robbery Case: On January 10, detectives arrested a 17-year-old male and a 16-year-old male, both of Charles County, in connection with a robbery of an acquaintance that occurred on January 8 in the area of Continental Drive and Sierra Lane in White Plains.

During the robbery, the suspects pointed a handgun at the victim and demanded his belt. The victim complied and the suspects fled. Officers and detectives pursued leads and identified the suspects. Search warrants were conducted at their homes and evidence linking the suspects to the robbery was recovered.

Both suspects were charged with robbery, first-degree assault, use of a firearm during the commission of a crime and other related charges. PFC McPherson and Detective Wimberly investigated.


11 Responses to Charles County Detectives Arrest Two Juveniles After Armed Robbery in White Plains

  1. Anonymous on January 13, 2020 at 4:41 pm

    They want to act like adults, treat them like adults. Post their names so we can publicly ridicule them.

  2. Anon on January 13, 2020 at 4:58 pm

    “Hey Simpson, you wanna trade belts?” -Jimbo
    “Well, not really, cause yours is just a piece of extension cord.” -Bart
    “Hey, Dude he’s ragging on your cord.” -Kearney
    “Get Him.” -Jimbo

  3. Bebop on January 14, 2020 at 11:11 am

    The future of Charles County.

  4. Wow on January 14, 2020 at 12:36 pm

    Armed robbery for a belt? Seriously? This country is F*CKED. And it has nothing to do with Trump

  5. Anonymous on January 14, 2020 at 1:53 pm

    Charge them as adults…

  6. Anonymous on January 16, 2020 at 12:04 pm

    Nice belt….

    Let’s steal it.

    We in the Dorf – No one will question it.

  7. Anonymous on January 16, 2020 at 7:27 pm

    You’re going to having to speak with the CO about that officers conduct. Did you do that? no. why? because i cant’ never get a hold of them, its always voice-mail. well, leave a message. no. why? i wish to remain anonymous. The CCSO deprives itself of a great many comments about CCSO, because their voice-mail system is such that we can leave a message, only, and can’t get ahold of them by phone. Keep trying. Its ok when you finally reach someone that you’re told that officer retired 5 years ago. Tell em what happened anyway & expect for it to be resolved, even if the CCSO ………. has no way of resolving it. Some, with desk phones, may have the attitude that they never pick up their phone & only respond to messages.

    • Anonymous on January 18, 2020 at 11:19 am

      Put the bowl down numb nuts.

  8. Davis, M. on January 16, 2020 at 7:45 pm

    The Maryland Courts have a vision & Mission statement. It doesn’t mention that the courts fine. It doesn’t mention that the court incarcerates. It doesn’t mention that the court gives license points. Why leave these things out?

  9. Anonymous on January 16, 2020 at 7:48 pm

    Would you rather have a search warrant from a judge that will or will not serve a full term?

  10. Anonymous on January 18, 2020 at 2:05 pm

    Sheriff so & so: yes Commissioner so & So. I see you haven’t asked for any funding of Crime Solvers. I happen to think highly of crime solvers, why not ask for funding for it? its privately funded. yes, but why not ask for funding for it? i’d be happy to give you some. i’d rather not have an on-the-record discussion about that. why not? everyone knows about crime solvers, don’t you support crime solvers? yes, but i’m not asking for any funding for it, and i’d rather not have any funding for it. i’ll talk to you privately about it. whats the big deal about discussing it on-the-record? commissioner, can we just stick with what i’ve asked for? ok, but i want to be on-the-record offering you funding for crime solvers. thank you, but i’m going to have to decline that. my goodness, who would have thought that would happen? why does crime solvers have to stay off-the-record?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.